Legal Video Producer Rejects Law Firm Request to Use AI to Exaggerate Injuries

The leading producer of personal injury "day in the life" videos and legal settlement documentaries in the United States has stated that artificial intelligence has no place in legal video production. This declaration from award-winning former network news correspondent Andrew Colton followed a request from a law firm to use AI to make someone's injuries appear more severe than they were. Colton, who works with more than 200 attorneys and law firms nationwide, emphasized that his professional productions are designed to credibly document injuries to facilitate appropriate settlements or judgments.

Colton asserted that it is inappropriate for any legal professional to suggest using AI to exaggerate injuries, and he refused the request despite potential backlash on attorney list serves. He highlighted that credibility is the most critical factor, even if it results in an unhappy law firm. This incident reinforces a message Colton has promoted for over a decade: hiring a communication professional for credible legal video production is essential for respectable attorneys, whereas relying on tech-school trained legal videographers who might use AI could lead to disaster.

Colton pointed out that some law firms employ Certified Legal Video Specialists (CLVS) for crucial aspects of personal injury cases, but these individuals typically record depositions and are not suited for documenting sensitive personal moments such as catheter maintenance or amputation aftermath. As a one-person operation working nationwide, Colton's video documentaries have consistently contributed to major settlements and judgments in various cases, including traumatic brain injury and wrongful death. His company, Colton Legal Media, is recognized as the leading producer in this field, offering services without domestic travel fees and operating globally.

The stance against AI in legal video production underscores broader ethical concerns in the legal industry regarding the integrity of evidence and documentation. By rejecting the use of AI to manipulate injury severity, Colton advocates for maintaining trust and authenticity in legal proceedings, which can impact settlement outcomes and judicial decisions. This position aligns with professional standards that prioritize factual accuracy over potential gains, reinforcing the importance of ethical practices in legal media production.