Oregon Cyclist Sues Ambulance Service for $900,000 After Collision and Subsequent Billing

In a case that underscores the complexities of emergency vehicle operations and patient billing practices, an Oregon man is suing Columbia River Fire & Rescue for $900,000 following a collision with an ambulance. The incident, which occurred on October 27, 2022, in Rainier, Oregon, has sparked debate about safety protocols for emergency vehicles and the ethical considerations of charging accident victims for emergency services.

William Hoesch, represented by attorney Travis Mayor of Mayor Law, LLC, filed the lawsuit after being struck by an ambulance while cycling. The collision resulted in multiple injuries to Hoesch, including damage to his face, left hand, hip, and diaphragm. Adding insult to injury, Hoesch was subsequently billed $1,862 for his transportation to the hospital following the accident.

The lawsuit, filed in Oregon Circuit Court, alleges negligence on the part of the ambulance service. Hoesch's medical expenses have already reached approximately $47,000, with potential future costs estimated at an additional $50,000. The cyclist reports ongoing pain, stiffness, and restricted mobility as a result of the incident.

Conflicting accounts of the crash have emerged, highlighting the challenges in determining liability in such cases. Hoesch claims he attempted to pass the ambulance on the right, expecting it to continue straight, when it made an unexpected turn. The ambulance driver, however, maintains that he was moving slowly with his turn signal activated and did not see Hoesch until impact.

This case raises important questions about the responsibilities of emergency vehicle operators and the rights of other road users. It also brings to light the controversial practice of billing accident victims for emergency services, even when the emergency vehicle may have been at fault. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for emergency service protocols and billing practices across the country.

The incident serves as a reminder of the need for constant vigilance and clear communication on the roads, especially when emergency vehicles are involved. It also highlights the potential for unintended consequences in emergency response situations, where the very vehicles meant to provide aid can sometimes become sources of harm.

As the case progresses, it may prompt a broader discussion about the balance between the urgent need for emergency services to reach their destinations quickly and the safety of other road users. Additionally, it could lead to a reevaluation of policies regarding the billing of patients involved in accidents with emergency vehicles.

Columbia River Fire & Rescue has acknowledged the allegations but has refrained from further comment, directing the matter to their legal counsel. The fire department's response to the lawsuit and any potential changes to their operational procedures will be closely watched by both the local community and emergency services nationwide.

This case serves as a stark reminder of the potential risks associated with emergency vehicle operations and the complex legal and ethical questions that can arise in their wake. As communities rely on swift emergency response times, balancing this need with public safety and fair treatment of accident victims remains an ongoing challenge for emergency services across the nation.